Cholesterol, of course, was the big story of the 1980s. As in the Framingham Study, the British Regional Heart Study found that the higher the blood cholesterol level, the greater the heart attack risk. Those in the top fifth for cholesterol (280mg/dl or more) had three times the heart attacks of those in the bottom [...] [...more]
Cholesterol, of course, was the big story of the 1980s. As in the Framingham Study, the British Regional Heart Study found that the higher the blood cholesterol level, the greater the heart attack risk. Those in the top fifth for cholesterol (280mg/dl or more) had three times the heart attacks of those in the bottom fifth (less than 212mg/dl). However, there were some heart attacks in those with a relatively low cholesterol level, suggesting that there is no level of blood cholesterol at which there is no heart attack risk. This is perhaps not surprising, as even the lowest levels of cholesterol here would be considered very high in, say, China, where a blood cholesterol level above 155mg/dl is very unusual. Perhaps in the U.S. everyone has too high a cholesterol level.
Professor Michael Oliver, now retired, spent most of his career in the University of Edinburgh’s Cardiovascular Research Unit. He worked for years on the reasons for Scotland’s unenviable position as the country with the most “heart” deaths. He points out that the southern French smoke as much as the Scots, eat as much fat as the Scots, and have high cholesterol levels, yet they have far less trouble with angina and have fewer heart attacks.
Professor Oliver is convinced that it is not the amount of cholesterol in the blood that determines the heart attack risk, but the quality of that fat (Oliver 1993). He compared the heart attack rates of Scots, Finns, Swedes (who have a low heart attack rate), and southern Italians (with an even lower heart attack rate than the Swedes).
Crucial to the heart attack rate in these four populations was the level of linoleic acid in the blood. The higher the linoleic acid level, the lower the heart attack risk. The levels were negligible in the Scots and high in the Italians and Swedes.
Linoleic acid is a polyunsaturated fat, found in cereals and some vegetable oils such as olive oil, which is heavily used in cooking by the Italians and other Mediterranean countries. Linked with the linoleic acid intake is what has been called the “Mediterranean diet,” with its reliance on fish, citrus fruits, garlic, green vegetables—all substances, according to Professor Oliver, that help prevent the blood clotting that is the first step towards a heart attack. Not surprisingly, Professor Oliver endorses a Mediterranean-style of eating for everyone, and especially for those who already have evidence of heart disease.
Interestingly, he also directly links smoking with high blood cholesterol and linoleic acid levels. His team’s research showed that coronary-prone people, such as people with angina or who have already had heart attacks, do not eat much food that contains linoleic acid. Smokers were even more selective about their choice of food: They had real dislikes for foods containing the protective fats. The more cigarettes they smoked, the less linoleic acid they had in their tissues. They ate less fish and less vegetable fiber than nonsmokers. The difference also applied to alcohol consumption: Smokers drank more than nonsmokers.
Professor Oliver postulated that smoking injures the taste buds, so that food containing protective fats and oils tastes less pleasant, and is rejected, perhaps subconsciously. Smokers also add more than the normal amount of salt to their food, a habit that tends to suggest that smoking changes—or, to be more accurate, poisons—the ability to taste.
*30\86\8*